Friday, 30 March 2012

Kristina part two, a follow-up (the lasting effects

Kristina part two, a follow-up (the lasting effects)  
"The Lasting Effects of Abuse"

I shared my story at a pair of Violence UnSilenced years ago [click here for original post VU]. My mother WAS Unable to care for me so she left me in the care of my grandparents (her mother andstep-father). Also in the home were my aunt and uncle. AbuseOccurred we BASIS daily at the hands of my Dad (grandpa).Sometimes It Was mentally abused purpose Usually It Was Bothphysical and verbal abuse. Everyone in the Household WAS ToldThat They Were no good and never Would Amount to anything.

In my opinion, my uncle bore the brunt Usually abuse history. Themental cruelty never stopped, Even After we all escaped the home.Papa's words echoed in our heads long Passed Away After ET.

Some of us dealt with (or are dealing with) the shame. Some of usSought (or are seeking behavior) Counseling to Understand That ItWas Not us. It Was His Problem. Others Passed from this lifeRemaining in pain and full of shame.

Five days before Christmas 2011, my uncle hung Himself to escapethe torment of years of history and echoes the father's voice inhistory head. With the Economic Conditions ET HAD to say all ofhistory lost money in the stock market. Because He Was Offereddestitute my aunt to Let Him move back home and live with her​​. HeTold her father That history HAD ABOUT HIM beens right all along.He Was a loser and never Would Amount to anything. I AmConvinced That history father's cruel words echoed in history ashead tied the rope around ET ​​history neck and Killed himself.

My sincere hope Is That anyone Continued Suffering from shameSeeks immediate counseling. Our family is from Devastated sa situation senseless death. If you know anyone please advise emSuffering to seek counseling Before It is too late.

Grassley's position on violence against women the right is disappointing


Grassley's position on violence against women the right is disappointing  This is the correct version of the article by Elizabeth Barnhill and invited by Laurie Schipper. An updated version appeared in this space above error. The administrator of the National Survey of domestic and sexual violence by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released in December reported that approximately 1 in 3 women were sexually assaulted by her partner and 1 in 4 women were assaulted physically by an intimate partner.
Congress is considering reauthorization of the Violence against Women, which funds domestic and sexual violence.
assault programs in the United States. Coalition against Domestic Violence and Iowa Coalition against sexual assault are very disappointed that Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Ia., Did not supported the bill in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
 
Senator Grassley, who has always been favorable, said in his testimony before Congress that, "There is nothing ... the need for the law which would disagree with ... I obviously want the law is reauthorized. "While our organizations understand that there were questions Senator Grassley thought worthy of consideration before approval, it does not seem possibleto justify their lack of support.
In a statement to the Senate, Grassley cited problems Government Accountability Office concluded that "remain" with the VAWA programs, and uses several examples of apparent misuse of federal money.
A letter from Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich said: "We do not have a" serious problem "with brokers who do not meet the requirements." Weich said that most reports on grants show that many of them are not about to waste, fraud or abuse. Most results are corrected by updating the accounting and improved documentation.
This is far from being a question of "fault" and should not have prevented Senator Grassley to provide an immediate and unconditional support of reauthorization. Although our organizations agree that the funds must be used with integrity and due diligence, there is no evidence that these issues have led to Senator Grassley to retain its vote in favor of support and protection for victimsthrough VAWA.
Grassley also insisted on a new requirement that local programs for victims of match 25 percent of all funds received VAWA. Local programs suffer the same effects of the economy worldwide.Donors have less to offer, private foundations are under the grant, and local businesses have less to invest in the community.
The lack of financial support does not mean that the local community is not compatible with the work of domestic violence and sexual assault agencies. This means that communities are in trouble and have no money to give. Grassley asked is that mostdomestic violence and sexual assault programs to squeeze blood from a turnip. By refusing their support, questions are raised about the commitment of Senator Grassley to serve victims.
Finally, Grassley cited weakened economy as their reasons for proposing that the VAWA funds remain level for five years without the possibility of an increase. Our latest data show that in Iowa September 15, 2011, 117 victims were not able to receive services, and 43 percent of local programs said the lack of funding as the reason why victims could not be considered.
These figures are virtually unchanged from the previous year. What changes is that funding continues to decline, while demand for services continues to increase, 96 percent of programs reported an increased demand for services.
Anyone can see that domestic violence programs and sexual assault can not afford to lose money, he can not afford victims the level of funding. Limit their access to services and supports that will keep them safe from their abusers.
VAWA was supported by a wide range of organizations across the country to a religious legal assistance to national partners in the prevention of domestic violence and sexual assault.
Our organizations are sad because Senator Grassley has not shown significant support and unconditional, not only the renewal of VAWA, but victims who are served by domestic violence and sexual assault agencies in your state and the countries.

When Home is no refuge for women



NEW DELHI - This month, the stories of two women, said bravely, helped to highlight the reality of domestic violence in India. Nita Bhalla, a journalist, wrote for the BBC being physically assaulted by their partners. Meena Kandasamy, poet and writer on social issues, wrote movingly in Outlook, a national magazine, to survive a violent marriage: "My skin was enough damage to tell their own story."Both Mrs Kandasamy and Bhalla, Ms are, in the words of Ms. Bhalla, "Professional, educated and independent" women, but that investigations into domestic violence in the country indicate, empowerment is not protection against abuse.
In 2005-6, the National Survey of Health and Family, led by the Ministry of Health in homes in 29 countries, attributed domestic violence in India. It was found that about 40 percent of married women across the country has experienced domestic violence, the investigation as a serious public health problem.
Ms. Kandasamy, who found shelter with her sister when she left the marriage, was atypical in that it explored the possibility of legal action. Only one in four women who were victims of domestic violence in their marriage has sought foreign aid, according to the survey by the Ministry of Health, and even these tend to rely on members of the family, and not the institutions of police protection or social.
Others, like Ms. Bhalla, faced with what she calls "incomprehensible silence of others - family, friends, neighbors and even passers-by -. I choose to turn a blind eye "
Vidyut Kale is a corporate trainer and blogger who has written extensively on witnesses of domestic violence in the family as a child, then deal with the abuse - sexual emotional and financial - in her own marriage.
"It is a mute - family friends or well-meaning who fear for the safety of women," he said in an interview. "The attacker does not want to focus on their actions, but the silence is broken liberating. I stopped having the shame when I spoke. "
In the six years since data from the Ministry of Health were published, some progress has been made in the. Legal and social, more women began to talk about domestic violence (only 1 per cent of complaints of violence and abuse is initiated by women against their male partners, according to survey results). In 2011, the popular Indian TV show "Dil Se Dua Di-Saubhagyavati Bhava" tells the story of a woman married to a man who is alternately charming and abusive.
Perhaps the most significant change was the implementation of the protection of women against domestic violence, a historic bill that took effect in 2006. For the first time, formally recognizes the right of women to protection against domestic violence and treat verbal, emotional and economic, as well as physical and sexual. Importantly for India, including unmarried couples and "sisters, widows and mothers" living in households shared.
In annual reports, women lawyer based in Delhi, Class Rights Initiative oversees the operation of the law on domestic violence.The 2011 report suggests that the courts have begun to use the law to issue orders of protection for women threatened by violence and arrest, to protect women from being expelled from a shared house.
A major problem identified by the women's rights organizations and the report of the Lawyers Collective is the attitude of police to domestic violence. Police are often the first point of contact for women who want to denounce the violence in their homes. There is confusion between the police of what constitutes domestic violence.For example, some officials believe that verbal abuse or a slap is acceptable and should not be reported.
However, investigations by the Lawyers Collective in several Indian states also show a change in the attitudes of police officers since the adoption of the law. An essential change in New Delhi, was the increased number of police officers who do not agree that domestic violence was just a family matter - suggesting that it may become easier over time for women to complain to the police.
Another important development would be in the role of hospitals.Since 1995, some hospitals and rural clinics have tried to record incidents of domestic violence, especially in the case of women who visit emergency rooms with bruises and other injuries. In 2000, a nongovernmental organization called Dilaasa began working in a general hospital in Mumbai, practitioners and hospital staff to identify and treat victims of abuse.
His experience of over 10 years found that women were more likely to share their experiences of violence with medical professionals to police. This year, some activists have suggested that the emphasis on hospital crisis center will be repeated in hospitals in India - a very necessary in a country where there are few shelters for victims of domestic violence.
"Most Indian women are in an environment of inequality," said Ms. Kale. "They leave their parents' home to her husband's house. If they are no longer welcome at his parents' home after marriage, what to do when there is violence in the home of her husband, why are homeless? "
Changes in the law and the social environment in the last decade have led to a discussion of these issues and changing family dynamics in India. As more women to share their experiences, it is unclear how widespread domestic violence, which runs through the community, caste and economic. For women trapped in violent homes, the solutions may not be obvious or easy. But India has started, at least, to recognize the problem.